Crystalline Solar Panels Vs Amorphous

They can also withstand the summer heat where mono or polycrystalline panels lose efficiency in the same ambient temperatures.

Crystalline solar panels vs amorphous.

Particularly in home solar power grid connect systems and how they affect the life of a solar panel. Amorphous offers the benefit of operating in lower light conditions and hence is suitable for many applications that are used in lighting since it will be able to put some charge into a battery at a lower light level than crystalline solar panels. A special version of our amorphous material is available and optimized for indoor light sources. In all our grid connect packages we only use good quality poly or monocrystalline panels except in very specific circumstances for the.

Crystalline panels need to be as perpendicular to the sun as possible to achieve the best performance. Amorphous is lower cost than crystalline although it s less efficient in converting sunlight to. Amorphous panels are also lighter in weight and more portable than monocrystalline or polycrystalline panels producing the same amount of energy. Amorphous has better indoor performance compared to crystalline in one test we conducted amorphous outperformed crystalline by 4x and we are constantly taking additional steps to make the material even better indoors.